zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. kappas+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-04-09 07:08:26
I wonder if it's possible to design a new formal language (something like lojban [1], with a grammar strictly based on formal logic) but with better UX so that it can be used by regular folks like me? Maybe combine something like Attempto [2] with a dedicated visual UI?

I would think a language like that could speed up knowledge base construction. Maybe it can also serve as a substitute for natural languages in some situations where we want our communication to be logically airtight.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lojban

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attempto_Controlled_English

On a separate note, I've always wondered how Cyc is pronounced. Is it "sike", or is it "see-why-see"?

replies(2): >>cess11+V5 >>Wesoly+uP
2. cess11+V5[view] [source] 2025-04-09 08:12:22
>>kappas+(OP)
I've always imagined it was supposed to be pronounced like 'psych', and that it was a corporate bullshit, marketing spelling, of that word.
replies(1): >>tsm+nb
◧◩
3. tsm+nb[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-04-09 09:14:34
>>cess11+V5
The etymology is from 'enCYClopedia'.
replies(1): >>cess11+Kz1
4. Wesoly+uP[view] [source] 2025-04-09 14:48:46
>>kappas+(OP)
I pronounce it like "tsits", because "cyc" in Polish means "tit" (the organ, not the bird), and it feels good.
◧◩◪
5. cess11+Kz1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-04-09 18:30:01
>>tsm+nb
I see, thanks.
[go to top]