zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. hitekk+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-04-08 23:15:58
A former employee of Cyc did an insightful AMA on HN back in 2019: >>21783828
replies(1): >>pvitz+aO
2. pvitz+aO[view] [source] 2025-04-09 10:03:58
>>hitekk+(OP)
> But the longer I worked there the more I felt like the plan was basically:

> 1. Manually add more and more common-sense knowledge and extend the inference engine

> 2. ???

> 3. AGI!

In retrospect, this reasoning doesn't seem to be so wrong.

replies(1): >>Cthulh+WX
◧◩
3. Cthulh+WX[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-04-09 11:55:39
>>pvitz+aO
I mean if I were to oversimplify and over-abstract AGI into a long list of if / elses, that's how I'd go about it. It's just that there's A Lot to consider.
[go to top]