Please explain with examples from nature.
Your argument begs the question. Attention is indeed scarce, but that's because ad tech has created an attention economy.
Assuming that advertising is the best use of human attention is - how can I put this politely? - really quite eccentric.
In nature there is limited access to food, water, mates, and shelter.
Economizing is the process of dealing with scarce resources.
Nature doesn't do markets. We do. If you apply market thinking to the wrong things, bad things happen. You don't serve the market. The market serves you.
No.
> Nature doesn't do markets. We do
Yes. It’s a social tool for coping with scarcity. Violence is another.