zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. PaulDa+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-04-05 23:09:05
OK, let me restate that: there are places (even a few within the USA) that have very few or no billboards, because they are banned.
replies(1): >>anjel+x1
2. anjel+x1[view] [source] 2025-04-05 23:24:27
>>PaulDa+(OP)
Good luck getting e.g. Formula 1 to take down their sponsorship banners.
replies(1): >>kristi+jt
◧◩
3. kristi+jt[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-04-06 06:32:18
>>anjel+x1
You don't think F1 would follow the law?
replies(1): >>LargoL+Ju
◧◩◪
4. LargoL+Ju[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-04-06 06:52:47
>>kristi+jt
Do you? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernie_Ecclestone#Controversie...
replies(1): >>stavro+OJ
◧◩◪◨
5. stavro+OJ[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-04-06 10:29:13
>>LargoL+Ju
I'm not sure what your argument is. I thought it was "they've done illegal things before", to which I'd say "backroom dealings aren't the same as a huge sign basically saying 'look at me breaking the law over here'", but that's so trivially obvious that I'm sure your argument can't be that.
[go to top]