zlacker

United States Digital Service renamed to DOGE

submitted by datadr+(OP) on 2025-01-21 02:22:50 | 130 points 96 comments
[view article] [source] [go to bottom]

NOTE: showing posts with links only show all posts
6. termin+c2[view] [source] 2025-01-21 02:41:21
>>datadr+(OP)
> Doge is an Internet meme that became popular in 2013

Hopefully Elon gets to the Harlem Shake or Gangam style soon.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doge_(meme)

7. bpp+f2[view] [source] 2025-01-21 02:41:36
>>datadr+(OP)
I have a few friends who were involved in the creation of the US Digital Service, and as it stands it is one of the absolute best parts of our government. Formed after the Healthcare.gov disaster, the USDS brings Silicon Valley tech knowledge to the government in an attempt to ensure that we all have the online government services that we deserve. It's a tiny agency up against a massive bureaucracy that is anything but open to new ways of doing things. And they've made progress, but not enough.

I'm going to try to look on the bright side and say that maybe this means the wonderful people at the USDS are about to get a huge influx of funding and staffing, and will get to better fulfill the promise of their agency. But at the same time, I'm afraid that this White House may not have the best interests of this particular agency in mind.

Fun side story: on my first day working on Barack Obama's presidential transition, I spent about four hours watching a presentation from the Section 508[1] department about how to make screen-reader accessible PDFs. It took three people to give that presentation – one to speak, one for the live demo, and another to advance the slides. It was quite a downshift from the campaign, where we'd moved very quickly to harness the tech we needed.

[1] https://www.section508.gov/

15. inopin+n3[view] [source] 2025-01-21 02:48:22
>>datadr+(OP)
"Agency has the meaning given to it in section 551 of title 5, United States Code" ... "each Agency Head shall establish within their respective Agencies a DOGE Team of at least four employees" ... "each DOGE Team will typically include one DOGE Team Lead, one engineer, one human resources specialist, and one attorney"

that's at least 500k in salaries even for the lowball public sector, and there are at least 230 federal agencies, which you can be damn sure are gonna interpret this as broadly as possible, i.e. including the subagencies that's 400+ under 5 USC § 551 (see https://www.federalregister.gov/agencies)

nothing like kicking off your "efficiency" drive with a $200m+ expense

31. brando+w4[view] [source] 2025-01-21 02:57:33
>>datadr+(OP)
Jen Pahlka—a HealthCare.gov rescue team member who helped start the US Digital Service—has been writing a really informative series of posts that summarize what the Obama administration learned from its efforts to make government more efficient.

Here's a good starting point: "Bringing Elon to a Knife Fight": https://www.eatingpolicy.com/p/bringing-elon-to-a-knife-figh...

The basic goal of making government work well is (or should be) bipartisan. The nuts and bolts of how you do that are really hard to get right.

◧◩◪◨
50. inopin+v6[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-21 03:14:46
>>aliasx+p5
multiple sources given at https://www.independent.co.uk/news/twitter-ap-elon-musk-meta...

also the whole "kitchen sink" image was probably a crude attempt at reinforcement

◧◩
54. rayine+i7[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-21 03:20:03
>>mmastr+62
The problem is that our government has been merely pretending to be serious while being extremely unserious: https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-solutions/2024/03/28/....

Musk, who has revolutionized two massive industries, is “serious.” The outgoing administration was cosplaying seriousness. America didn’t want to reelect Trump. They did it because the “grownups in the room” were a tire fire that managed to do almost everything wrong, from immigration to foreign policy.

◧◩
61. CyberD+U9[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-21 03:37:07
>>mmastr+62
Unfortunately I think they are serious, just not about solving the problems they say they will solve.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=joV-9FFoA3Q

◧◩
68. rayine+7f[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-21 04:26:51
>>w10-1+D2
There was already a lawsuit filed off the bat challenging the structure of DOGE, so repurposing DS might have been to preempt that: https://www.politico.com/news/2025/01/20/doge-lawsuits-musk-...

It’s also possible DS had a critical mass of SV people that wasn’t beholden to existing bureaucracies. The structure of the DOGE teams embedded in each agency makes me think that someone thought through this quite carefully: https://www.wsj.com/livecoverage/trump-inauguration-presiden...

◧◩◪◨
75. rayine+cS[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-21 11:40:36
>>mike_h+nI
FDR’s criticism of public unions applies more generally: https://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2011/02/18/the-first-b.... The elected government shouldn’t have to cajole and negotiate with unelected civil servants to execute its agenda.

The comments about Starmer are shocking. So was the “Resistance.”

◧◩◪◨
89. thesup+N92[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-21 19:02:17
>>insane+E12
https://www.forbes.com/sites/siladityaray/2025/01/21/trump-a...

https://www.axios.com/2025/01/21/trump-meme-coin-crypto

[go to top]