zlacker

I deleted my social media accounts

submitted by joeman+(OP) on 2025-01-12 22:26:35 | 400 points 478 comments
[view article] [source] [go to bottom]

NOTE: showing posts with links only show all posts
18. margin+d6[view] [source] 2025-01-12 23:10:32
>>joeman+(OP)
I don't think deleting social media accounts is a good idea. Used appropriately, social media can be very useful and open doors that would otherwise not be available.

The problem is when you are just looping[1], absentmindedly opening and closing news and social media sites for hours. This can eat a lot of time, and is generally pretty draining.

I've been adding separate user accounts based on what tasks I'm doing, and locking them down so they can only perform those tasks.

I have a social media account (which I'm on right now), I have a coding account which I can not access news or social media from, and I have a few other accounts. This creates friction when task switching, and makes it so I have to be a bit more deliberate with how I use the computer. (I have social media blocked on my phone, as I find that's just not compatible with a happy life)

I've also recently been setting up Site Specific Browsers[2], basically custom PWAs, a web browser with no URL bar and no tabs, to further add barriers between tasks (like checking CI) and just noodling on the web. (I use electron to do this, but you can also use chrome by starting it with --app=https://www.example.com/ . Sadly Firefox has removed the ability to do this. )

[1] https://xkcd.com/1411/

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Site-specific_browser

◧◩
29. walrus+Q6[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-12 23:14:40
>>wordof+96
That's not all FB is doing.

https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/social-media/meta-new-hate-spee...

"Meta will allow its billions of social media users to accuse people of being mentally ill based on their sexuality or gender identity, among broader changes it made to its moderation policies and practices Tuesday.

...

The long list of changes to the new hate speech guidelines include removing rules that forbid insults about a person’s appearance based on race, ethnicity, national origin, disability, religious affiliation, caste, sexual orientation, sex, gender identity and serious disease. Meta also scrapped policies that prohibited expressions of hate against a person or a group on the basis of their protected class and that banned users from referring to transgender or nonbinary people as “it.”"

40. Kim_Br+v7[view] [source] 2025-01-12 23:18:56
>>joeman+(OP)
See also:

Don’t build your castle in other people’s kingdoms (2021)

https://howtomarketagame.com/2021/11/01/dont-build-your-cast...

HN Discussion:

>>41712885

95. recurs+Cb[view] [source] 2025-01-12 23:47:13
>>joeman+(OP)
I doubled down on my social media account (twitter) and htmx finished first in the 2024 rising stars for front end frameworks:

https://risingstars.js.org/2024/en#section-framework

so... it depends.

◧◩◪
105. jpmatt+qc[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-12 23:55:28
>>jjuliu+pb
I like communicating with friends, old and new. It's not hard to eliminate the cruft by using chrome extensions and filtering only by friends' posts, ie https://www.facebook.com/?filter=friends

So again, it strikes me as a huge opportunity, especially for someone who just does the basics.

◧◩◪
113. xyzzy4+kd[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-13 00:03:58
>>walrus+Q6
>accuse people of being mentally ill based on their sexuality or gender identity

But the question is, are trans people actually mentally ill objectively? It certainly doesn't help them reproduce (a form of survival) from a biological perspective, for example.

This Johns Hopkins professor thinks it's mental illness:

https://www.boarddocs.com/vsba/scpsva/Board.nsf/files/B8UR4X...

148. ChrisA+8l[view] [source] 2025-01-13 01:11:20
>>joeman+(OP)
Related:

Be a property owner and not a renter on the internet

>>42581119

151. pmarre+4m[view] [source] 2025-01-13 01:18:16
>>joeman+(OP)
No.

Because of what nindalf said, basically: >>42678031

◧◩◪◨
180. esafak+mD[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-13 04:16:58
>>xyzzy4+kd
The author's study is controversial. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_R._McHugh
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯▣
210. throwa+aI[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-13 05:24:48
>>angora+tt
As of 2023 the model was to allow taking a handle even if it already exists but did not post for a while: https://www.businessinsider.com/elon-musk-x-twitter-inactive...

So it seems unlikely they would keep deleted handles forever. I bet they become part of this marketplace program a la "premium domains".

◧◩◪◨
249. junto+LQ[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-13 07:08:57
>>xyzzy4+kd
It’s nuanced. Something that appears to have been lost during the last years of trans hate.

> Like all DSM illnesses, one key component of depression, anxiety, schizophrenia, all of that, is that you have to be functionally impaired by it, otherwise it doesn’t count as a diagnosis

https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2023/07/19/health/is-gender-dysphori...

Many trans people fought to keep it in the DSM for the simple reason that health providers would have refused treatment if it was removed.

There are many trans people that have had treatment and live perfectly happy lives. What makes many trans people unhappy is society’s persistent persecution of them in politics and media.

◧◩
386. tibors+cc1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-13 11:00:37
>>ameliu+t91
You are targeting an order of magnitude larger organization than it's necessary. The EU doesn't build anything, people in countries do.

The problem with the EU market is that if I launched anything social, I'm immediately hit with a localization problem so I have to launch first either in English (you lost 53% of people)* or start with a few select countries first with their native language.

It's kinda a mess. Money is not really the issue with EU startups, it's the cultural fragmentation.

There are also many small niche social platforms, but of course nothing like FB/X/etc..

* https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/2979

◧◩◪◨⬒
404. pickle+jh1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-13 11:51:06
>>Semaph+OO
>And finally: Ordering. Non-chronological ordering makes no sense, because everything is random (probably not, somehow maximizes engagement for users very different from me, I guess). So I can’t even scroll for the stuff I want to see.

Does https://www.facebook.com/?sk=h_chr not work anymore? It should surface the chronological feed without reels and other recommended slop.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯▣
406. latexr+ej1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-13 12:10:48
>>labste+za1
Right, that’s the toupée fallacy.

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Toupee_fallacy

You only know about the people who let you know. You have no idea how many vegans or airplane pilots you encounter regularly who never tell you. A small sample is driving the reputation of the whole.

For people with whom you talk every day, it’s no surprise that you know. It’s bound to come up but I doubt it happened on your first conversation with everyone. If it did, you were hanging out with a weird group. If they knew each other, it’s normal that they’d talk about a shared interest. Just like people who hang out on HN would be likely to discuss tech when meeting in person.

I have no doubt you found your share of asshole vegans, just like there are assholes who make it a point to make everyone know they eat meat.

Though it is important to distinguish a true asshole from someone simply sharing an experience. Saying “no, thanks, I’m vegan” when offered a bite of a meat sandwich is not bragging, it’s context. Unfortunately, too many people take it to be a judgement when it most often is not.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ExEHuNrC8yU

◧◩◪
419. aemble+gv1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-13 13:48:26
>>Semaph+GI
I found that this plugin really helped: https://www.fbpurity.com/
◧◩◪
422. aemble+vw1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-13 13:57:22
>>parsim+T8
FB Purity plugin helps. It removes all the suggested posts, advert and other junk. Unfortunately, it only works on desktop: https://www.fbpurity.com/

I can scroll through Facebook now on my laptop, and it means I stop doing so on my phone. I have the phone app just to post updates or to quickly check the location of an event or something.

◧◩◪◨
447. incomi+DG2[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-13 19:42:09
>>__Matr+FE
So I only use facebook on desktop, I don't have it installed on my phone. When I go to the website, at the top of the page is 'feeds' and on the left is 'friends' filter. I just bookmark that page and only view that.

https://www.facebook.com/?filter=friends&sk=h_chr

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯▣▦▧
457. latexr+0P3[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-14 01:27:46
>>aziazi+343
That video is part of a larger series on Gamergate. If you liked that one, it’s worth it to see everything.

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLJA_jUddXvY62dhVThbee...

I also recommend these two earlier videos, on unrelated matters.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PmTUW-owa2w

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4N6y6LEwsKc

◧◩
475. oblio+Yl8[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-15 11:21:08
>>bArray+gj1
> There is a global recession coming, everybody is trimming the fat where possible, all tech industries are cutting where possible. I think it can be reasonably argued that the very nature of fact-checking is a dangerous one anyway - by nature of which facts are used (perspective problem) and what gets checked.

https://companiesmarketcap.com/meta-platforms/operating-marg...

What recession??? We've heard this line for 5+ years now. They're cutting where possible because they can and because the job market is in a dumpster at the moment.

[go to top]