zlacker

[parent] [thread] 7 comments
1. skeled+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-12-29 00:59:40
Since when is there video that's not meant to be viewed? Is there also audio not meant to be listened? Written words not meant to be read? Of people want something to listen in the background while doing something else, there's music, podcasts and audiobooks.
replies(2): >>Michae+O3 >>apprec+QV
2. Michae+O3[view] [source] 2024-12-29 01:39:56
>>skeled+(OP)
> Since when is there video that's not meant to be viewed?

Since the day they were invented? Certainly by the mid 50s there were hundreds of different relgious sects all over the world with prohibitions of some kind.

Because different people can have differing opinions… or do you somehow believe literally 100% of the human population shares that opinion?

replies(1): >>skeled+UB2
3. apprec+QV[view] [source] 2024-12-29 14:01:16
>>skeled+(OP)
Why aren’t people allowed to to use movies or tv shows as background listening?

I know several people on my life who have been leaving a TV on in their house all day, for decades before Netflix existed. Personally I can’t stand this, but because it’s a distraction, not because they are somehow disrespecting someone involved in the production who wants to believe they are an artist.

replies(1): >>skeled+dB2
◧◩
4. skeled+dB2[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-12-30 04:11:35
>>apprec+QV
Oh they can use it for background listening, but content shouldn't be specifically designed for that mode. Same way people using a hammer to drive screws shouldn't have screws designed for hammer driving. It just doesn't make sense when something more appropriate already exists.
◧◩
5. skeled+UB2[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-12-30 04:19:01
>>Michae+O3
The viewing of particular visual content being restricted by some religion, etc is a different argument from visual content somehow designed not to be viewed - by anyone - being created. The former is a matter of opinion, the latter a pointless paradox.
replies(1): >>Michae+824
◧◩◪
6. Michae+824[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-12-30 18:13:11
>>skeled+UB2
The latter is also an opinion, because the people who decide to create videos are also fallible human beings…

Unless you believe it’s impossible for someone to have contradictory or incoherent intentions?

replies(1): >>skeled+MD7
◧◩◪◨
7. skeled+MD7[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-01 13:06:43
>>Michae+824
Nothing about opinion or fallibility here. The latter is theoretically possible, but practically senseless. In a very literal way. There is 0 purpose to have something visual that is not intended to be consumed visually. What is a picture that is never seen? This is actually very similar to the philosophical question of whether or not a tree falling in a forest with nothing to hear it makes a sound, but this isn't philosophy we're dealing with.
replies(1): >>Michae+8ih
◧◩◪◨⬒
8. Michae+8ih[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-01-05 16:31:55
>>skeled+MD7
“0 purpose” according to who…?
[go to top]