zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. vladva+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-12-28 16:04:29
I think it depends on which kind of bandwidth we're talking about. I can follow a talk-show no problem while doing laundry / the dishes / vacuum / iron. Keyword being "talk". But I can't look at the screen too often.

So, watching a sitcom or similar where the characters' body language or facial expressions are important is an exercise in frustration.

replies(1): >>BlueTe+0h
2. BlueTe+0h[view] [source] 2024-12-28 18:08:40
>>vladva+(OP)
Yeah, so that's what radio is for (including in recorded form, aka podcasts).

Making video (more complicated than "talking heads") so nobody watches it is such a waste... (so is non peer to peer mass streaming, come to think of it).

replies(1): >>mindsl+4g1
◧◩
3. mindsl+4g1[view] [source] [discussion] 2024-12-29 02:05:48
>>BlueTe+0h
> so is non peer to peer mass streaming

erm, I'm a huge proponent of both peer to peer networking and piracy but it's hard to argue that transiting backbone links is more efficient than CDN boxen sitting at ISPs right next to last mile links.

[go to top]