Yeah, I'll get right on that. Sheesh, the risk-sensitivity of the modern medical profession is a bit ridiculous, sometimes.
Edit: I'm interpreting this as "throw out all the litter and replace it with fresh litter", which anyone who owns a cat will surely agree is insanity.
What is likely worse is that they can only document the worst cases, and cannot measure the subtler impacts on seemingly healthy infected people.
Maybe this is a major cause of ADD, or depression, or dyslexia, or autism, etc... we haven't done the research, so we aren't even bothering to test or treat a clearly extremely common infection. Its stupid.
https://twitter.com/GC_Milne/status/1457831246344691718
It also has a case where curing a female from t.gondii(right after she got it) cured her depression.
If you can afford it, it is a must have.
T. gondii came for you. Please, start to panic and howl right now while running to buy my product.
Lets talk about p-hacking:
About 50% of the population had Toxoplasma gondii at some point in their lives
0.35% of the population are schizophrenic.
If Toxoplasma gondii really causes schizophrenia the correlation effect is not really strong or consistent. Without T. gondii "would be" 0.17%.
As the huge majority of the people that suffered T. gondii infection never develops schizophrenia we could also safely conclude that having cat pets PROTECTS against schizophrenia.
Because correlation is not causation necessarily, and a third actor (ehum... alcohol, drugs) could be creating that increase in mental illness.
How many people that "does not have a pet cat" is schizophrenic?