zlacker

A record-high share of 40-year-olds in the U.S. have never been married

submitted by gmays+(OP) on 2023-07-01 13:59:00 | 107 points 213 comments
[view article] [source] [go to bottom]

NOTE: showing posts with links only show all posts
18. 29athr+U7[view] [source] 2023-07-01 14:46:01
>>gmays+(OP)
The chart is just another "wtf happened in 1971" moment.

https://wtfhappenedin1971.com/

What happened in 1971? The Nixon Shock, which is when the dollar stopped being convertible to gold after it became evident that the US did not have the gold it claimed to have.

◧◩◪
50. brvsft+ya[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-07-01 15:00:25
>>iancmc+c8
He is, but he is also a convenient scapegoat here.

The US was running up debts with post-WWII behavior for quite a while, especially with wars in Korea and Vietnam. This is what Charles de Gaulle was talking about when he referred to the US' "exorbitant privilege" in 1965 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exorbitant_privilege) before repatriating France's gold. Multiple presidents preceeded Nixon and continued promoting expansionist policy and meddling in foreign countries with war (that the US could not afford if not for our exorbitant privilege), mostly to compete with or try asserting dominance over USSR.

◧◩◪
82. traffi+se[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-07-01 15:21:06
>>lyu072+V9
Like many…odd aspects of current society, it’s hard to tell what’s intentional.

In this case, the Medical Assistance In Dying (MAID) movement seems to suddenly be making significant progress after stalling since the 90s - just in time for culling expensive Boomers [1] (and, also in Canada, mentally ill homeless and teens).

As mentioned in the link, assisted suicide is being pushed by providers (at least to some degree), which still doesn’t prove intention, but is quite a bit more concerning than people deciding on this course of action by themselves.

[1] https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/veterans-maid-rcmp-investig...

◧◩◪
93. lotsof+yg[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-07-01 15:34:54
>>ivan_g+8f
Secular Israeli fertility rate does not seem materially higher.

https://www.economist.com/middle-east-and-africa/2022/08/18/...

https://archive.is/8FAsi/4ca20b298a776c0318c24337c475fa4dce0...

https://www.taubcenter.org.il/en/research/israels-exceptiona...

>Though Haredim are just 13% of the population, their offspring make up 19% of Israeli children under the age of 14, and 24% of those under the age of four.

>As can be seen, secular Jews are roughly at 2 children per woman and "religious" (but not Haredi) are at 4. Once again, other OECD countries are roughly between 1.0 and 1.7 and falling. And they, too, have a share of religious traditionalists.

◧◩◪◨⬒
124. onlyre+1q[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-07-01 16:24:24
>>drumhe+qh
Contrary to popular opinion - physical attractiveness and intelligence are highly correlated: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S01602...

Higher IQs are correlated with higher incomes, too: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2023/02/230208125113.h...

Anecdata source of one - but most of my friends from college who could've ended up with many many women ended up with women that had super rich parents, and most of the women that everyone was crazy about ended up with men with rich parents.

None of them claim to have married for money - but from the outside - the odds seem to be that at least some of them probably did.

◧◩◪◨⬒
149. lotsof+GP[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-07-01 18:27:49
>>mcphag+cP
https://www.brookings.edu/articles/middle-class-marriage-is-...

Page 82 and on have graphs:

https://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdfplus/10.1257/jep.30.2.79

◧◩◪◨⬒
161. 29athr+2c1[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-07-01 20:26:30
>>ForHac+w71
Again, we are talking about the same thing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bretton_Woods_system#Wartime_d...

◧◩◪◨⬒
162. 29athr+Rc1[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-07-01 20:30:38
>>cmrdpo+9S
"It likely had little to no effect"

https://wtfhappenedin1971.com/

I don't see manned missions to the moon every year from NASA anymore, do you?

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯
166. ivan_g+Fd1[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-07-01 20:34:01
>>CountS+gU
How Birthright, a non-profit that organizes travel to Israel for young adults from other countries[1], is relevant to Israeli demographics? On their scale of operation, even if they had a significant repatriation rate (which I doubt), it would probably be just a 1-2% of their target group.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birthright_Israel

◧◩◪◨
197. FooBar+Qa3[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-07-02 15:32:00
>>FooBar+Nh
To expand on this argument with a historical analogy, here is an interesting except I just stumbled across in the Wikipedia article about Enclosure [1]:

> In Tudor England the ever increasing demand for wool had a dramatic effect on the landscape. The attraction of large profits to be made from wool encouraged manorial lords to enclose common land and convert it from arable to (mainly) sheep pasture. The consequent eviction of commoners or villagers from their homes and loss of their livelihoods became an important political issue for the Tudors.[44] The resulting depopulation was financially disadvantageous to the Crown. The authorities were concerned that many of the people subsequently dispossessed would become vagabonds and thieves. Also the depopulation of villages would produce a weakened workforce and enfeeble the military strength of the state.[44]

From this my mind goes to the Highland Clearances [2] (and to America's Rust Belt and England's North).

In both cases, capitalists were more than happy to replace people with sheep, because that's where the profits lay.

The interesting thing about the quote above, is that it fits the pattern I mentioned, in which the interests of capitalists are not exactly the same as the State's.

[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enclosure#The_end_of_the_Ope...

[2] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Highland_Clearances

[go to top]