zlacker

[parent] [thread] 7 comments
1. airstr+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-10-12 14:38:15
At this point, I actually pay for Netflix + Hulu(+ESPN+Disney) + Amazon Prime + I get HBO Max with my AT&T plan otherwise would also have to pay for that one. In the past I have also paid, for a limited amount of time, for Apple TV, Paramount+, Starz, Cinemax, The Criterion Channel, FuboTV, BritBox and Peacock. I'm probably forgetting a few.

I'm fairly certain Comcast's cable package they keep spamming me costs less than those combined

Media consumption is expensive again. All we've done is move from the cable bundle with terrible content to a different set of un-/re-bundled channels where the slightly better content lives.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/08/10/hbo-max-d...

replies(2): >>lotsof+C2 >>Bayart+N3
2. lotsof+C2[view] [source] 2022-10-12 14:50:47
>>airstr+(OP)
Media consumption of everything all at once is expensive.

But it is on demand now, which is a great improvement.

And people can also pick and choose. I can buy individual episodes or seasons, or I can pay for one service per month and then cancel and pay for another next month. Or people can pay for everything all at once if they want. Or they can watch YouTube for free or pay to have fewer ad breaks.

I see lots of improvement compared to the previous situation.

replies(2): >>sseagu+k4 >>jjuliu+yb
3. Bayart+N3[view] [source] 2022-10-12 14:56:08
>>airstr+(OP)
The Criterion Channel and MUBI are the only video streaming subscriptions I ever found real sustained value in.
◧◩
4. sseagu+k4[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-10-12 14:58:00
>>lotsof+C2
> I can pay for one service per month and then cancel and pay for another next month

I would not be surprised to see this go away. Some services have shows released regularly one episode at a time, which mimics broadcast TV (although that doesn't really bother me, and can be a good thing).

But I would be willing to bet that they begin restricting access to these shows based on subscription length or something (can only see a show with a 1 year subscription or something).

The goal is 100% to retake control from the consumer (well, it is to make money, but they will do that via controlling what a consumer can see).

replies(2): >>lotsof+vd >>edgyqu+0N
◧◩
5. jjuliu+yb[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-10-12 15:25:53
>>lotsof+C2
>I can buy individual episodes or seasons...

Can you, though? By this I mean, what does "buying" an episode/season look like? Have you simply paid for a license to watch the content via the provider you subscribe to as long as the provider continues to hold onto it's agreement with the rights holder that allows them to host the content, and you continue to pay said provider a monthly access fee? Or do you possess a physical copy, or a digital file, of the episode/season, un-DRM'd, on a device that you own?

replies(1): >>lotsof+pc
◧◩◪
6. lotsof+pc[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-10-12 15:29:10
>>jjuliu+yb
That is true, I should rephrase to state I can rent for an unspecified amount of time. But I also do not care enough about media to care if it goes away. I just buy for the toddlers who like to watch things on repeat. For me, I just rent whenever I want to watch something,
◧◩◪
7. lotsof+vd[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-10-12 15:33:09
>>sseagu+k4
That is fine with me, media is a completely nonessential part of life, and a seller can sell how they want and a buyer can choose to buy or not buy.

The great thing is the unnecessary middleman that used to restrict how sellers can sell is now out of the picture. Or in Comcast’s case, merged into one entity.

But that is a separate problem of government not designating fiber internet as a utility.

◧◩◪
8. edgyqu+0N[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-10-12 18:06:31
>>sseagu+k4
No the goal is to make money
[go to top]