[1] https://web.archive.org/web/20210126003211/https://upvotes.c... [2] https://web.archive.org/web/20210126003211/https://upvotes.c...
EDIT: looks like this hug-of-deathed the site, thats certainly one way to deal with this.
Here's the relevant pages from the Internet Archive:
- https://web.archive.org/web/20210302035850/https://upvotes.c...
- https://web.archive.org/web/20210120172656/https://upvotes.c...
Upvotes are $1.95, "max: 10/new post - We upvote with very strong accounts; if you don’t make it to the main page after at most 10 of our upvotes and a few organic ones, more won’t help!"
Comments are $7.50
Presumably figuring out which "very strong accounts" are used for this would be a case of buying some upvotes and comments and watching which accounts are used.
> http://web.archive.org/web/20210126003211/https://upvotes.cl...
Frankly, it would be enough for dang to buy one and ban all these accounts. They would have to gather all their karma from zero. Ethically grey though.
Seriously - get help.
The website itself claims to be organic advertising, and it's certainly something that would work. This is actually used in practice on sides like Reddit[1].
And it depends on your definition of advertisement, I guess. A new version of $product coming out getting to the front page here is advertisement, but (in theory) organic, from people who are genuinely interested in $product.
If that's taken advantage of (like it is in reddit), then you can manufacture that organic "advertising".
From what other people in the thread are saying, it appears HN mods clamp down hard on this stuff, so it's probably not much of a concern here, but it's still interesting to see.