zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. lordna+(OP)[view] [source] 2019-11-26 18:07:36
Don't you find it useful to check that you're visualising the functions correctly? I'd say the calculator was most useful to me as an exploration tool than anything else.

I think some can also do calculus, which is something where you can often miss a term or forget a minus, so definitely useful for checking that kind of thing.

replies(1): >>oefrha+i2
2. oefrha+i2[view] [source] 2019-11-26 18:18:42
>>lordna+(OP)
For the kind of functions seen in American math curricula, no, I don’t need help visualizing them, but that’s me. However, I do believe one should develop their intuition through graphing by hand; typing into the calculator, however painful, doesn’t develop anything other than RSI.

I think my TI (yeah I did have one as the prize of some math competition...) could do some integration too but I never used it.

The thing is these crappy calculators do a poor job of pretty much everything they claim to do. Some of the functionality might help with learning, sure, but you’d better use an actual computer (including a modern smartphone). It’s not 1980s anymore...

replies(1): >>saagar+LO
◧◩
3. saagar+LO[view] [source] [discussion] 2019-11-27 00:06:56
>>oefrha+i2
I prefer using my TI-89 over e.g. Mathematica. There’s something about purpose-built hardware that lends itself to being able to do things quickly and reliably.
[go to top]