zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. aidenn+(OP)[view] [source] 2019-11-26 16:00:01
There are a lot of buttons. Those probably push the BOM up. If you switched to using a shitty membrane keypad you could probably save a lot of money.
replies(3): >>Slarti+v >>button+j1 >>mkl+P3
2. Slarti+v[view] [source] 2019-11-26 16:03:19
>>aidenn+(OP)
If I remember the innards of my TI-83 correctly (I used it during school 15 years ago, added LED lighting to the display and tore it apart for that purpose) Texas Instruments already uses a shitty membrane keypad. At least I don't remember seeing lots of microswitches.
replies(1): >>aidenn+x5
3. button+j1[view] [source] 2019-11-26 16:07:33
>>aidenn+(OP)
How are the buttons different from a $12 Casio fx-300ES for example?
4. mkl+P3[view] [source] 2019-11-26 16:20:14
>>aidenn+(OP)
I don't think I've used a TI calculator (they're not in NZ much), but with the sole exception of my HP 48G every make and model of calculator I've used in the past 30+ years has used a crappy membrane keypad.
◧◩
5. aidenn+x5[view] [source] [discussion] 2019-11-26 16:28:40
>>Slarti+v
It's possible. I'm old enough that I had an 82.
[go to top]