zlacker

>>jeremy+(OP)
Loved this article, I'm really interested by the BB numbers in particular and how they relate to the halting problem.

And I though I could win this silly game with my Knuth's Up Arrow notation and vague knowledge of Ackermann's sequence!

>>tux3+0f
BB(6) could be bigger than Graham's number but we don't even know, that's how big it is

the busy beaver function grows so fast that for some number N it's always going to be larger than any number we can describe in normal math notation

so if you define Graham's number as a function of N like g(N) where Graham's number is g(64), busy beaver still grows faster and for some N it will be bigger