zlacker

>>jeremy+(OP)
If BB is the highest paradigm published, and it is assumed BB numbers, given enough time and resources, can be computed, and you can't use BB2, why can't you simply go:

    BB(BB(BB(BB(BB(11111)))))

Repeat as many BB's as you have space on your 1000 character card. You might even use math notation to define a new function where

    BB-(n) = [BB(BB(.......]
              <---- n ----->

And then you might have:

    BB-(BB-(BB-(1111)))(BB-(BB-(BB-(1111)))(11111))

Or some such monstrosity.

>>meric+Ag
The logical conclusion of this is considering all general computations that can be done with a BB calculator in hand, which leads you to the hyper BB numbers that he refers to, or BB_2.