zlacker

[return to "Bro pages: like man pages, but with examples only"]
1. enjo+p2[view] [source] 2014-01-25 17:31:37
>>_yfoe+(OP)
This is great. I'm really just looking for examples most of the time I'm looking through a man page anyways.

As for the "bro"trevorsy that is brewing in these comments. Lighten up for crying out loud.

◧◩
2. benatk+N6[view] [source] 2014-01-25 18:27:25
>>enjo+p2
"Lighten up" doesn't solve anything. I'm not against jokes but the implying man in man pages means male and not an abbreviation of manual is exclusionary.

http://therealkatie.net/blog/2012/mar/21/lighten-up/

◧◩◪
3. anigbr+t7[view] [source] 2014-01-25 18:36:12
>>benatk+N6
The entire Unix command line is exclusionary. If it wanted to be inclusive 'man' would be called 'help'. We're not using 300bps dumb terminals any more, I fail to see the value in forcing everyone to learn commands like cp and mv instead of copy and move.
◧◩◪◨
4. sharpn+mp[view] [source] 2014-01-25 22:40:42
>>anigbr+t7
http://meyerweb.com/other/humor/pcunix.html

Man pages are called person pages. Also history has been completely rewritten, and is now called herstory.

The nice command was historically used by privileged users to give themselves priority over unprivileged ones, by telling them to be nice. In System VI, the sue command is used by unprivileged users to get for themselves the rights enjoyed by privileged ones

[go to top]