zlacker

[return to "HN Frontpage ranked using only votes from accounts over a year old"]
1. pg+e[view] [source] 2009-05-13 17:55:14
>>pg+(OP)
I wanted to see if there had been any visible decrease in quality. Doesn't look like it. There's surprisingly little difference between this and the regular frontpage.
◧◩
2. prakas+X1[view] [source] 2009-05-13 18:42:51
>>pg+e
What inspired you to do this?

As a quick & dirty test, can I see "HN Frontpage ranked using only votes from accounts over 2 years old"?

Can you turn this into a feature, with a user-specified time period? -- would be an awesome filter to view HN by and to see, if, over a period of time there is any difference in quality?

Thanks very much!

◧◩◪
3. colins+d3[view] [source] 2009-05-13 19:25:37
>>prakas+X1
Yeah, when you think about it the general form is also true: it doesn't make a lot of sense to hard-code the sorting algos
◧◩◪◨
4. Retric+J6[view] [source] 2009-05-13 21:27:15
>>colins+d3
Calculating that stuff on the fly is simple and fast with a single hard-coded algorithm vs using a custom view per user. You would also need to store a lot more information to be able to recalculate this stuff. Granted HN does not seem to cache it's pages, but it's one of the first options when looking to increase speed.

PS: Even just limiting sorting to the top 1000 overall stories and top 1000 new stories could be a major speed bump.

[go to top]