zlacker

[return to "HN Frontpage ranked using only votes from accounts over a year old"]
1. pg+e[view] [source] 2009-05-13 17:55:14
>>pg+(OP)
I wanted to see if there had been any visible decrease in quality. Doesn't look like it. There's surprisingly little difference between this and the regular frontpage.
◧◩
2. comato+g2[view] [source] 2009-05-13 18:52:22
>>pg+e
This makes the assumption that 'senior' members' voting habits haven't degraded over time. Say a bad post hits the front page - would this subtly influence future votes (regardless of how old someone's account is), resulting in more bad posts making the front page?

On a semi-related note, it would be neat to keep a history of the front page at regularly sampled intervals (say every year, starting at year 1) and see how the two measurements diverge over time.

[go to top]