zlacker

[return to "Ask PG: Why don’t you open source HN?"]
1. wmf+y[view] [source] 2013-01-04 03:10:07
>>muelle+(OP)
The source is called news.arc and you can find old versions on the Web, e.g. https://github.com/nex3/arc/ https://github.com/nex3/arc/blob/master/lib/how-to-run-news
◧◩
2. muelle+a1[view] [source] 2013-01-04 03:22:20
>>wmf+y
thanks, but to clarify: I'm not proposing to open source it for the purpose of looking at the code or forking my own HN-version.

instead i'm proposing that building _this_ site becomes an community effort, with open feature discussions and people committing code to the HN code base.

there is an army of people who deeply care about HN, and are very skilled to help out. i think it would be smart to use that asset.

◧◩◪
3. colech+X4[view] [source] 2013-01-04 05:01:29
>>muelle+a1
I think any improvements would make this site worse.

It is so very common for projects to inflate with new features until they become useless piles of filth. The fact that HN is a bit clunky is a feature not a bug. It will only attract and retain a certain type.

◧◩◪◨
4. muelle+A6[view] [source] 2013-01-04 05:44:55
>>colech+X4
You probably meant it slightly differently, but improvements that make things worse are per definition not improvements.

I get that people don't want HN to get worse than it is. But i don't get why people think open sourcing it would result in that.

I trust PG would be the kind of project lead who only accepts pull requests that would actually improve the site.

And I trust the community has a lot of smart people who would come up with solutions that would actually improve this site.

[go to top]