>>ration+yl1
There would have to be some substance to the original article for that to be true. Instead, it merely contains analysis-free whinging ostensibly meant to nurture frustration that can be directed to other ends - likely making the problem itself worse. So my comment is more appropriately described as examining the larger scope to put the article's gripe in perspective.
If you want to see my constructive thoughts on the subject at hand, in spite of the useless article as a starting point, you can check out my other follow up comments.