zlacker

[return to "Anki ownership transferred to AnkiHub"]
1. infota+Ih[view] [source] 2026-02-02 22:05:15
>>trms+(OP)
On the plus side, the actually good mobile Anki client, AnkiDroid, remains out of the hands of this potentially questionable new entity.

(AnkiDroid has always been run independently, which is good, considering the state of the iOS client, which has always been neglected.)

◧◩
2. __floa+Jk[view] [source] 2026-02-02 22:15:24
>>infota+Ih
The (paid!) iOS client has always been a disappointment to me, and I've long been jealous of the open source Android one.

I don't mind so much that it's paid, given how much use I get for the price, but it sucks knowing it sucks and not being able to help make it better.

◧◩◪
3. divan+G11[view] [source] 2026-02-03 01:50:39
>>__floa+Jk
Is it still 25$ price? Makes it impossible to recommend Anki to friends/students to "try spaced repetition".
◧◩◪◨
4. Larrik+Y41[view] [source] 2026-02-03 02:10:32
>>divan+G11
Just have them use it on their computer or the web?

It improved my grades so much in college that I spent the 25 bucks as a broke student so I could have it on my second hand iPad. This was before AnkiDroid even existed so it's amazing the price is still the same.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. divan+Fe2[view] [source] 2026-02-03 12:01:40
>>Larrik+Y41
That works for people who already convinced that they want to use it. I'm talking about people who've heard it for the first time and they're not going to spend 25$ for some new app just to try. 25$ is unusually high price for an AppStore app and it's just doesn't work unless you're really determined to use it. I don't understand why people are downvoting this.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. herman+Mk2[view] [source] 2026-02-03 12:40:06
>>divan+Fe2
They can just use the computer version then, and buy it when they know it's useful for them?
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. divan+Vr4[view] [source] 2026-02-03 22:41:40
>>herman+Mk2
Some people would need to buy computer first. Again, it's very hard to recommend mobile app to people if you need to add these kind of "workarounds". Especially for the main target audience - young students – many of whom live in their mobile phones and not used to spend 25$ for apps.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯
8. herman+FT5[view] [source] 2026-02-04 10:20:14
>>divan+Vr4
Every university student in the Western world has access to a Computer, and those who are poor usually have an Android Phone (with free AnkiDroid) and not a very expensive iPhone. If they can afford an iPhone they can afford the App

I think this "problem" is somewhat made up

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯▣
9. divan+tE9[view] [source] 2026-02-05 11:11:14
>>herman+FT5
Well, I don't want to sound patronizing, but the world is so much bigger than your notion of "Western world" where every student with iPhone has computer.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯▣▦
10. Larrik+3ce[view] [source] 2026-02-06 17:47:18
>>divan+tE9
You are patronizing. Every student with an iPhone has access to a computer even if it isn't their own. If they are so poor that none of their facilities have one then they have a cheap Android.

This fictional person you describe also has access to the web and Anki on there.

Anki is not a very useful tool if you are not making or editing your own decks or a teacher is for you. This is an incredibly painful experience on mobile.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯▣▦▧
11. herman+baf[view] [source] 2026-02-06 23:29:37
>>Larrik+3ce
Well I have a friend who manages his entire self written 10.000 Card collection entirely on an Samsung Tab with AnkiDroid.

I would agree with you, but he doesn't seem to mind

[go to top]