zlacker

[return to "AI didn't break copyright law, it just exposed how broken it was"]
1. wtetzn+wn[view] [source] 2026-02-03 17:28:40
>>at1as+(OP)
> If you paint a picture of Sonic the Hedgehog in your living room, you are technically creating an unauthorized derivative work

Is this even true? It might violate a trademark, but I don't think it would violate copyright law unless it was a copy of an existing picture.

◧◩
2. voxic1+517[view] [source] 2026-02-05 13:40:39
>>wtetzn+wn
Characters are copyrightable, its a similar situation to song compositions vs song masters. There is the copyright of the original picture/song master but separately there is the copyright of the song composition/character. Making your own work derived from the same character or song composition is still a derivative work even if it doesn't directly copy the song master/original picture.
[go to top]