zlacker

>>jacque+(OP)
(2015)

>>treeta+P4
Are you suggesting that the fact that I wrote it in 2015 somehow makes it 'dated'?

I could update it but I think the fact that it was written before Trump I actually makes it more powerful than less, and you're welcome to extrapolate from 2015 to 2026 and see where it's headed.

>>jacque+a7
Are you suggesting that they're suggesting anything beyond what date this was written on, since we usually point that out in almost every article that has not been written in the current year for a variety of reason, including "oh, yeah, I remember I already read this without even clicking, it's not new, I might as well go read the comments directly"?

>>klez+q8
No, I'm not, hence the question.

>>jacque+ga
Adding a date for older articles and posts is a very common HN convention

>>46896376

ideally it should be in the submitted title, if not often someone will post it as above .. and later a mod might add it.

No biggie, as they say.

>>defros+Fa
Of course I was completely unaware of that...

>>jacque+5b
Yeah, TBH, I figured you knew ... I'm juggling a few things and probably put this general note in where it wasn't needed. Pax.