zlacker

[return to "AI didn't break copyright law, it just exposed how broken it was"]
1. klustr+Xn[view] [source] 2026-02-03 17:30:19
>>at1as+(OP)
Copyright infringement use to be the absolute worst crime imaginable if you asked the tech industry, that is until they started doing it themselves at scale and now they are claiming it’s the law that’s broken, it’s crazy.
◧◩
2. at1as+gC[view] [source] 2026-02-03 18:23:40
>>klustr+Xn
I think this is part of a recurring pattern in tech of pushing boundaries around copyright.

In the last few years, we had Google scanning books, Google threatening to shut down News in Canada rather than pay publishers, LLMs summarizing articles on social platforms, crawlers bypassing paywalls, and so on.

Each time, the industry frames it as their interpretation of the current law, which were usually not written with these specific future use cases in mind.

In my view the current discussion regarding Gen AI is similar.

◧◩◪
3. 8note+af6[view] [source] 2026-02-05 06:55:26
>>at1as+gC
i still dont see why google should pay news publishers for each reader google sends to the publisher. like the publisher is getting that view already and can monetize it how they see fit
[go to top]