zlacker

>>Fascin+(OP)
What I really want to see from a "*-programming-language" post on HN is _why_. Why Lily?

>>onesev+fEb
The README on gitlab at least has a sentence or two on that: https://gitlab.com/FascinatedBox/lily

> An interpreted language with a focus on expressiveness and type safety

Personally I think typed scripting languages could be the future. They should support AOT compilation where necessary.

>>andyfe+bGb
a statically typed aot compiled scripting language is... not

>>nofrie+wOb
"Scripting" is a role: an embedded, human-friendly, compact language, also suitable for interactive work / REPL.

(Laugh all you want, but Haskell has a rather nice REPL, and can work as a scripting language.)