zlacker

[return to "Claude Code: connect to a local model when your quota runs out"]
1. paxys+c7c[view] [source] 2026-02-04 21:59:44
>>fugu2+(OP)
> Reduce your expectations about speed and performance!

Wildly understating this part.

Even the best local models (ones you run on beefy 128GB+ RAM machines) get nowhere close to the sheer intelligence of Claude/Gemini/Codex. At worst these models will move you backwards and just increase the amount of work Claude has to do when your limits reset.

◧◩
2. bityar+upc[view] [source] 2026-02-04 23:40:55
>>paxys+c7c
Correct, a rack full of datacenter equipment is not going to compete with anything that fits on your desk or lap. Well spotted.

But as a counterpoint: there are whole communities of people in this space who get significant value from models they run locally. I am one of them.

◧◩◪
3. Gravey+Lqc[view] [source] 2026-02-04 23:50:19
>>bityar+upc
Would you mind sharing your hardware setup and use case(s)?
◧◩◪◨
4. Camper+lrc[view] [source] 2026-02-04 23:55:28
>>Gravey+Lqc
Not the GP but the new Qwen-Coder-Next release feels like a step change, at 60 tokens per second on a single 96GB Blackwell. And that's at full 8-bit quantization and 256K context, which I wasn't sure was going to work at all.

It is probably enough to handle a lot of what people use the big-3 closed models for. Somewhat slower and somewhat dumber, granted, but still extraordinarily capable. It punches way above its weight class for an 80B model.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. redwoo+Zsc[view] [source] 2026-02-05 00:04:15
>>Camper+lrc
Agree, these new models are a game changer. I switched from Claude to Qwen3-Coder-Next for day-to-day on dev projects and don't see a big difference. Just use Claude when I need comprehensive planning or review. Running Qwen3-Coder-Next-Q8 with 256K context.
[go to top]