zlacker

>>mxfh+(OP)
Waaaht? And, why? Budgets? This is/was a wonderful resource. I'll be sad to see the back of it.

>>kayo_2+7l
The why is a good question. I don't think it is the budget; to me it seems more as if Wikipedia kind of phased it out.

>>shevy-+mm
Wikipedia used it. And it had much information not in Wikipedia. And it was concise. And its structure was consistent.