zlacker

[return to "A sane but bull case on Clawdbot / OpenClaw"]
1. okinok+rx3[view] [source] 2026-02-04 14:17:29
>>brdd+(OP)
>all delegation involves risk. with a human assistant, the risks include: intentional misuse (she could run off with my credit card), accidents (her computer could get stolen), or social engineering (someone could impersonate me and request information from her).

One of the differences in risk here would be that I think you got some legal protection if your human assistant misuse it, or it gets stolen. But, with the OpenClaw bot, I am unsure if any insurance or bank will side with you if the bot drained your account.

◧◩
2. swiftc+d85[view] [source] 2026-02-04 21:41:14
>>okinok+rx3
And the risk isn’t really the bot draining your account, it’s the scammer who prompt injected your bot via your iMessage integration draining the account. I can’t think of a way to safely operate this without prefiltering everything it accesses
[go to top]