zlacker

[return to "I miss thinking hard"]
1. keyle+i7[view] [source] 2026-02-04 05:07:50
>>jernes+(OP)
I don't get it.

I think just as hard, I type less. I specify precisely and I review.

If anything, all we've changed is working at a higher level. The product is the same.

But these people just keep mixing things up like "wow I got a ferrari now, watch it fly off the road!"

Yeah so you got a tools upgrade; it's faster, it's more powerful. Keep it on the road or give up driving!

We went from auto completing keywords, to auto completing symbols, to auto completing statements, to auto completing paragraphs, to auto completing entire features.

Because it happened so fast, people feel the need to rename programming every week. We either vibe coders now, or agentic coders or ... or just programmers hey. You know why? I write in C, I get machine code, I didn't write the machine code! It was all an abstraction!

Oh but it's not the same you say, it changes every time you ask. Yes, for now, it's still wonky and janky in places. It's just a stepping stone.

Just chill, it's programming. The tools just got even better.

You can still jump on a camel and cross the desert in 3 days. Have at it, you risk dying, but enjoy. Or you can just rent a helicopter and fly over the damn thing in a few hours. Your choice. Don't let people tell you it isn't travelling.

We're all Linus Torvalds now. We review, we merge, we send back. And if you had no idea what you were doing before, you'll still have no idea what you're doing today. You just fat-finger less typos today than ever before.

◧◩
2. nunez+zn[view] [source] 2026-02-04 07:44:12
>>keyle+i7
You _think_ you're thinking as hard. Reading code != writing it. Just like watching someone do a thing isn't the same as actually doing it.
◧◩◪
3. abm53+Iq[view] [source] 2026-02-04 08:07:51
>>nunez+zn
Correct… reading code is a much more difficult and ultimately, productive, task.

I suspect those using the tools in the best way are thinking harder than ever for this reason.

◧◩◪◨
4. dns_sn+Qs[view] [source] 2026-02-04 08:24:51
>>abm53+Iq
> reading code is a much more difficult

Not inherently, no. Reading it and getting a cursory understanding is easy, truly understanding what it does well, what it does poorly, what the unintended side effects might be, that's the difficult part.

In real life I've witnessed quite a few intelligent and experienced people who truly believe that they're thinking "really hard" and putting out work that's just as good as their previous, pre-AI work, and they're just not. In my experience it roughly correlates to how much time they think they're saving, those who think they're saving the most time are in fact cutting corners and putting out the sloppiest quality work.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. godels+jU1[view] [source] 2026-02-04 17:21:54
>>dns_sn+Qs

  The first principle is that you must not fool yourself--and you are the easiest person to fool. So you have to be very careful about that.

  - Feynman
[go to top]