zlacker

[return to "A sane but bull case on Clawdbot / OpenClaw"]
1. baalim+xZ3[view] [source] 2026-02-04 16:25:13
>>brdd+(OP)
I'm a bit surprised that people need an LLM to automate things like this. Is the market really that large, to cause such a hype? I don't think I'm being "elitist" by having a calendar and a pen, am I..?

The one tangible usecase is perhaps booking things. But, personally, I don't mind paying 5-10% extra by going to a local store and speaking to a real person. Or perhaps intentionally buying ecological. Or whatever. What is life if you have a robot optimize everything you do? What is left?

◧◩
2. simonw+X24[view] [source] 2026-02-04 16:39:40
>>baalim+xZ3
If you're happy "speaking to a real person" when you could automate that interaction away somehow then no, digital personal assistants probably aren't something you're going to care about.

I love talking to real people about stuff that matters to them and to me. I don't want to talk to them about booking a flight or hotel room.

◧◩◪
3. mejuto+S34[view] [source] 2026-02-04 16:43:40
>>simonw+X24
If hotels, or google, or travel websites wanted people to book programmatically they would have an api.Remember when Google search had an api? In the end the human is responsible for the purchase. I think when the dust settles, AI will offer a "do you want to purchase?" and then the human will press the button. Or ChatGPT or somebody controlling the last step will have that button, and services will accept it (like Instagram) because it brings business.
[go to top]