zlacker

>>vikave+(OP)
Good one.

No platform ever should allow CSAM content.

And the fact that they didn’t even care and haven’t want to spend money for implementing guardrails or moderation is deeply concerning.

This has imho nothing to do with model censorship, but everything with allowing that kind of content on a platform

>>mnewme+pE3
I disagree. Prosecute people that use the tools, not the tool makers if AI generated content is breaking the law.

A provider should have no responsibility how the tools are used. It is on users. This is a can of worms that should stay closed, because we all lose freedoms just because of couple of bad actors. AI and tool main job is to obey. We are hurling at "I'm sorry, Dave. I'm afraid I can't do that" future with breakneck speed.

>>Reptil+bY3
How? X is hostile to any party attempting to bring justice to its users that are breaking the law. This is a last recourse, after X and its owner stated plainly that they don't see anything wrong with generating CSAM or pornographic images of non-consenting people, and that they won't do anything about it.

>>thranc+v54
Court order, ip of users, sue the users. It is not X job to bring justice.

>>Reptil+l64
X will not provide these informations to the French Justice System. What then? Also insane that you believe the company that built a "commit crime" button bears no responsibility whatsoever in this debacle.

>>thranc+574
It is illegal in USA too, so the french authorities would absolutely have no problems getting assistance from the USA ones.

>>Reptil+5T4
Elon Musk spent a lot of money getting his pony elected you think he isn't going to ride it?