zlacker

[return to "221 Cannon is Not For Sale"]
1. emptyb+dq[view] [source] 2026-02-03 18:38:24
>>mecred+(OP)
1. Author lost me at his first sentence: "Like most people, I’ve had my identity stolen once or twice in my life." I am careful and aware of this possibility, but AFAIK I have not experienced this, nor have "most people" I know. o_O Crazy times.

2. I don't even understand how a title transfer could happen without verifying ownership. Is the title system in the USA decentralized or that much different than elsewhere? i.e. Torrens-style

◧◩
2. kstrau+g21[view] [source] 2026-02-03 21:29:26
>>emptyb+dq
In the dark old days before Apple Pay, where it was common in America to hand your credit/debit card to some rando at a restaurant and have them disappear with it for a few minutes, about once a year my bank would call me to ask if I'd been using my card in some far-off locale:

"Hi! Are you in Tijuana?"

"Not since 1993. Why? What's up?"

"So you didn't just try to buy gasoline at a PEMEX there?"

"Nope, I'm in San Francisco as speak."

"OK, thanks! We'll get a new card out in the mail to you."

That's a pretty low bar for identity theft, but I think it's defensible.

◧◩◪
3. bookof+oZ2[view] [source] 2026-02-04 12:32:20
>>kstrau+g21
Remember when credit cards required your signature on the back?
◧◩◪◨
4. wildzz+Yb3[view] [source] 2026-02-04 13:58:11
>>bookof+oZ2
My mom used to tell me to write CHECK ID in the signature block. Someone only ever asked me once. It's probably been like 10 years since I've signed the back of a new card. An older woman at an antique shop actually checked for a signature and made me sign it in front of her.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. kstrau+lJ3[view] [source] 2026-02-04 16:32:10
>>wildzz+Yb3
If you look at the credit card agreement, a card isn’t (or at least wasn’t) authorized for use unless it had an actual signature. “Check ID” and such are cute, but really only mean that the card is unsigned and thus invalid.
[go to top]