zlacker

[return to "A sane but bull case on Clawdbot / OpenClaw"]
1. okinok+rx3[view] [source] 2026-02-04 14:17:29
>>brdd+(OP)
>all delegation involves risk. with a human assistant, the risks include: intentional misuse (she could run off with my credit card), accidents (her computer could get stolen), or social engineering (someone could impersonate me and request information from her).

One of the differences in risk here would be that I think you got some legal protection if your human assistant misuse it, or it gets stolen. But, with the OpenClaw bot, I am unsure if any insurance or bank will side with you if the bot drained your account.

◧◩
2. bobson+pJ3[view] [source] 2026-02-04 15:13:32
>>okinok+rx3
...Does this person already have a human personal assistant that they are in the process of replacing with Clawdbot? Is the assistant theirs for work?
◧◩◪
3. bennyd+bP3[view] [source] 2026-02-04 15:40:43
>>bobson+pJ3
He speaks in the present tense, so I assume so. This guy seems detached from reality, calling[AI] his "most important relationship". I sure hope for her sake she runs as far as she can away from this robot dude.
[go to top]