zlacker

[return to "Y Combinator will let founders receive funds in stablecoins"]
1. cj+ul[view] [source] 2026-02-03 19:56:56
>>shscs9+(OP)
This is intersting.

Occasionally in YC founder circles a new founder will raise a bunch of money and then ask something like "What's the best way to invest all the money our company just raised?"

The responses are always along the lines of "Your startup is already risky. Don't innovate in areas of your business where the status quo is known to work. Innovate your product + technology, don't be innovative with your company's finances, HR, etc"

That advice always stuck with me. It just makes a lot of sense to do things in the most boring way possible, except where it matters (your competitive advantage <-- that's where you innovate, that's where you set yourself apart)

Running a startup is distracting enough. Doing things non-standard just adds to the list of distractions that you don't need as a founder.

◧◩
2. Aurorn+iq1[view] [source] 2026-02-04 02:07:53
>>cj+ul
YC, like most incubators, has always encouraged their companies to use products and services from other companies in their portfolio.

The simplest explanation is that this is a mostly symbolic move: They want to show that the stable coin and crypto companies they invest in are actually trusted by YC. It starts to look hypocritical if an investor is funding crypto companies and praising them as important breakthroughs, but not actually using them where it’s important.

◧◩◪
3. latexr+Qd2[view] [source] 2026-02-04 09:30:39
>>Aurorn+iq1
> YC, like most incubators, has always encouraged their companies to use products and services from other companies in their portfolio.

Advising unproven risky businesses to depend on other unproven risky businesses? Doesn’t that just increase the likelihood that something goes wrong?

◧◩◪◨
4. jazzyj+cl2[view] [source] 2026-02-04 10:28:11
>>latexr+Qd2
Does anyone remember being voluntold to use Skiff for email and calendar, instead of a product that actually handles timezones in event invites?

I'm convinced the point of YC must be something other than launching successful businesses

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. bombca+MC2[view] [source] 2026-02-04 12:38:24
>>jazzyj+cl2
I mean it’s obvious that successful businesses are only a side effect of what the point is - a successful exit. And if one big success can be strongarmed to help other ventures exit successfully, they’ll do it.

Why wouldn’t they?

[go to top]