zlacker

[return to "xAI joins SpaceX"]
1. baggac+B1[view] [source] 2026-02-02 21:57:21
>>g-mork+(OP)
Well surely this acquisition is above board. Nothing funny going on here, just good old business as usual.
◧◩
2. google+24[view] [source] 2026-02-02 22:05:47
>>baggac+B1
It's widely reported that Musk is a majority shareholder of xAI and the controlling shareholder of SpaceX (close to 80% of voting shares). Not surprising that he would be looking to consolidate ownership under one entity especially if he perceives significant synergies (i.e., data centres in space).
◧◩◪
3. newyan+T4[view] [source] 2026-02-02 22:08:27
>>google+24
I have never understood how Data centers in space ever make economic sense, the payload, latency and many other issues make it difficult at least for the immediate needs
◧◩◪◨
4. ben_w+tC5[view] [source] 2026-02-04 09:54:01
>>newyan+T4
DCs in space have a lot of problems, but latency isn't really one of them. At least for inference*, I don't care if a chat response comes with a 0.2 second ping time (Earth-GEO-Earth at the speed of light), and I definitely don't care if a vibe coding session has a 2.5 second ping time (Earth-Moon-Earth).

I wonder what the largest viable ping time would be, for vibe coding? If it exceeds 40 minutes (my pre-Christmas experimentation would have been fine with that but it was just experiments), these things could be on Mars on the opposite side of the sun and still be useful.

* I have no idea what training needs, neither fundamentally nor currently in practice

[go to top]