zlacker

[return to "New York’s budget bill would require “blocking technology” on all 3D printers"]
1. iancmc+XE1[view] [source] 2026-02-03 23:29:07
>>ptorro+(OP)
Yeah but what about CNC milling machines? Way more guns are made on those every day than 3d printers. There is even one you can buy that is specifically for making "ghost guns"
◧◩
2. echelo+aG1[view] [source] 2026-02-03 23:35:13
>>iancmc+XE1
I'm way more worried about drones, self-driving cars, and humanoid robots than "ghost guns".

Once these things can move around us, far away from their owner, there is enormous potential for societal harm.

Someone could buy a $10k Figure robot, strap a bomb or nerve agent to it, then have it walk into a public place.

If we just accept these robots as normal everyday things (it seems like we will), we wouldn't even blink or think twice that a robot was walking up to us.

I hate monitoring and tracking and surveillance. I'm a freedom and personal liberty absolutist for most things without negative externalities. But as I put this new AI tech through thought experiments, I don't know how we'll survive in a normal world anymore when agency is cheap and not tied to mortality.

Society, even one with guns, relied on the fact that people are afraid of the consequences of their actions. If there's no ability to trace a drone or robot, god only knows what could happen.

Kidnappings, murders, terrorism. It seems like this might become "easy".

How hard is it going to be to kill off political opponents in the future? Putin, for instance, enjoys relative freedom of movement because it's hard to get close to him.

Once you can throw a drone into a field or rooftop and have it "sleep" for months until some "awake" command, then it operates entirely autonomously - that's cheap, easy to plan, and potentially impossible to track.

Some disgruntled guy buys some fertilizer, a used van, and comma.ai?

We potentially have a very, very different world coming soon.

◧◩◪
3. MagicM+NP1[view] [source] 2026-02-04 00:29:19
>>echelo+aG1
The first person to build ChatGPT with limbs wins.

The British army only has maybe 20,000 actual soldiers. You could manufacture enough robots to kill them all in a week. Then you’d just have a whole country.

It’ll completely change the game. There’s no point selling it to a state for their army, when you could just instantly make yourself the owner of the state.

◧◩◪◨
4. Rugnir+VK2[view] [source] 2026-02-04 08:34:46
>>MagicM+NP1
this is so handwavy about so many disciplines of human effort?

robotics? (if you can assume AGI with a perfect world model and perfect motor skills you're insanely further than we are now, like hundreds of years in the future)

military planning? (the british isles haven't been invaded since roman times, hint its not for lack of soldiers)

logistics? (power? fuel? ammunition? boats? planes? parachutes?)

law? (where are you launching your invasion from? how are you testing the killbots without being noticed? who is letting you?)

it seems like the only way you believe this is if you've given completely up on trying to understand anything and just truly to your core think that AI = magic

[go to top]