zlacker

[return to "France dumps Zoom and Teams as Europe seeks digital autonomy from the US"]
1. larsny+9j[view] [source] 2026-02-03 17:55:49
>>AareyB+(OP)
There seems to be a huge business opportunity in Europe right now, to sell support and customization of open source software to government players. Has anyone heard about a European company that’s been successful in this area?
◧◩
2. noneth+0y[view] [source] 2026-02-03 18:50:03
>>larsny+9j
Just goes to show how many structural problems there are to starting tech companies in Europe.
◧◩◪
3. yardie+ZD[view] [source] 2026-02-03 19:14:46
>>noneth+0y
Yes, the problem is capital. US has loads of it and Europe does not. So a lot of European startups have 3 options: remain niche, get bought out buy US investors, move the corporate seat/brain trust to the US.

There are many small European startups who do not have infrastructure to take on large European multinationals as clients. A lot of EU labor laws have hard requirements at 50 and 100 employees so startups stay below those lines and remain tech lifestyle companies.

◧◩◪◨
4. ericma+iH[view] [source] 2026-02-03 19:27:27
>>yardie+ZD
Well the other large advantage is that the US is one single market with one common language (English) and while there are variations by state, pretty much one set of rules. So by starting a company in the United States you of course have access to incredibly deep capital markets, but you also have access to 350 million people mostly operating under one set of rules with one common language and largely one common culture. It's the same market advantage that China has, by and large.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. ifwint+jR[view] [source] 2026-02-03 20:13:13
>>ericma+iH
It's one of the big ironies of the EU - every time it gets larger (good! increases market size) it also gets more fragmented in terms of languages, retained local rules etc. (bad, obviously).

Now up to 24 official languages and still potentially growing in the future (although this is a bit of an overcount because some of them are mutually intelligible to various degrees, it's still a lot).

It's interesting to think that at the time of original ECSC treaty there were only four languages (French, German, Dutch and Italian). That's just about manageable, now it is a bit of an issue

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. epolan+oz1[view] [source] 2026-02-04 00:03:32
>>ifwint+jR
I've been working with European companies for a decade, language is not a barrier for scaling, local laws are.

E.g. why eu has some laws in terms of data and privacy, local laws take precedence (unlike in e.g. agriculture that it's entirely EU's business). Scaling across borders is expensive and difficult for regulatory reasons.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. ifwint+Qx2[view] [source] 2026-02-04 08:28:03
>>epolan+oz1
To be fair the US is not immune to that issue either, some states (looking at you CA) are very fond of making random extra state laws that don't exist at the federal level and affect commerce
[go to top]