zlacker

[return to "Show HN: Octosphere, a tool to decentralise scientific publishing"]
1. j-pb+IO1[view] [source] 2026-02-04 02:40:55
>>crimso+(OP)
Nothing based on DOIs and OCRIDs will ever be properly decentralised.

You need content addressing and cryptographic signatures for that.

◧◩
2. tbrown+6U1[view] [source] 2026-02-04 03:30:00
>>j-pb+IO1
Email is pretty decentralized without those things.
◧◩◪
3. j-pb+eW1[view] [source] 2026-02-04 03:49:56
>>tbrown+6U1
And it is infamously insecure, full of spam, and struggles with attachments beyond 10mB.

So thank you for bringing it up, it showcases well that a distributed system is not automatically a good distributed system, and why you want encryption, cryptographic fingerprints and cryptographic provenance tracking.

◧◩◪◨
4. leland+AY1[view] [source] 2026-02-04 04:12:52
>>j-pb+eW1
And yet, it is a constantly used decentralized system which does not require content addressing, as you mentioned. You should elaborate why we need content addressing for a decentralized system instead of saying "10MiB limit + spam lol email fell off". Contemporary usage of technologies you've mentioned don't seem to do much to reduce spam (see IPFS which has hard content addressing). Please, share more.
[go to top]