zlacker

>>ptorro+(OP)
So what's next? People will re-flash their printers with an open-source firmware that won't do the checks? Who's liable in this case?

>>IFC_LL+cX1
There would be a presumption of intent. Probably an "aggravated" add-on to whatever charges you might be facing.

I highly doubt we would send goon squads door to door to check your firmware. Then again, given today's situation in MN, I wouldn't rule it out either.