zlacker

[return to "Lessons learned shipping 500 units of my first hardware product"]
1. cwal37+ZM7[view] [source] 2026-02-03 23:18:51
>>sberen+(OP)
> As someone who generally stays out of politics, I didn’t know much about the incoming administration’s stance towards tariffs, though I don’t think anyone could have predicted such drastic hikes.

I have an appreciation for very bright lamps, and the project is neat, but that stuck out to me.

I'm always fascinated by people who both feel comfortable ignoring maybe the single most impactful society-determining apparatus but will also say "no one could have seen that coming", where that is whatever they were unaware of because they chose to check out. I find the stance so fascinating because for myself, it would be impossible to not try and understand why the world is the way it is.

Everything is downstream of politics whether people want to recognize that or not, and choosing to ignore it is, in fact, a political choice.

◧◩
2. EarlKi+8U7[view] [source] 2026-02-03 23:57:25
>>cwal37+ZM7
What I find particularly galling is that he failed to learn perhaps the most important lesson: Maybe he wouldn't have these kind of problems if he hadn't outsourced his manufacturing to China but kept in on-shore instead.
◧◩◪
3. nemoma+218[view] [source] 2026-02-04 00:39:02
>>EarlKi+8U7
Last Trump term, a small business making PC cases locally in california went out of business because of steel tariffs. I'm not sure that local manufacturing in small batches is much safer given there's aluminum and other material tariffs this time too?
◧◩◪◨
4. EarlKi+o78[view] [source] 2026-02-04 01:19:54
>>nemoma+218
Cost was not the only issue addressed by OP.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. nemoma+G88[view] [source] 2026-02-04 01:29:01
>>EarlKi+o78
Other than the back and forth / lead time issues on checking issues, what do you think a local manufacturer shop in the US would do better? If the takeaway was needing to specify stuff in the design phase earlier that's kind of a universal manufacturing lesson I think.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. fn-mot+Rc8[view] [source] 2026-02-04 01:56:52
>>nemoma+G88
> what do you think a local manufacturer shop in the US would do better?

The post documents issues like some assembly workers stuffing so much wire into the post that not enough protruded to make a connection. I will hope that in the US the workers are paid enough that they notice/care that the result can be connected. Or the managers.

Do you want documented experiences of Chinese manufacturing repeatedly attempting to cut corners? Like substituting inferior goods to increase their profit margin even after the initial product line is running smoothly.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. abraae+4e8[view] [source] 2026-02-04 02:07:32
>>fn-mot+Rc8
The example - the cable not extending far enough from the post to make a connection - was explained in the article as something he failed to specify properly. Not a failure of the manufacturing partner.

For this not to be a problem a worker would have to notice it and put two and two together, then investigate further and then persuade their supervisor to raise it with the customer and get a change made to the spec.

While enjoying your faith in the rigour and attention to detail of the US assembly line worker, I think this example tells exactly the story the article says it does - that you have to specify everything.

[go to top]