zlacker

[return to "New York’s budget bill would require “blocking technology” on all 3D printers"]
1. jp1919+k7[view] [source] 2026-02-03 16:21:10
>>ptorro+(OP)
It's not illegal to make your own firearm, you just can't sell it.
◧◩
2. reacto+G7[view] [source] 2026-02-03 16:22:25
>>jp1919+k7
They want to make it illegal
◧◩◪
3. ameliu+0a[view] [source] 2026-02-03 16:31:26
>>reacto+G7
Maybe they should look more at how other countries quite successfully banned fire arms. Hint: it wasn't by banning printers.
◧◩◪◨
4. Austin+Ta[view] [source] 2026-02-03 16:34:51
>>ameliu+0a
They could attempt it, but the Second Amendment is quite clear that a constitutional amendment would be necessary to ban firearms and ammunition.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. Retric+Mc[view] [source] 2026-02-03 16:41:16
>>Austin+Ta
Forearms yes, percussion caps no.

A large fraction of the harm from firearms comes from their ability to fire rapidly which didn’t exist when the constitution was written. As such it was making a very different balance of risk between the general public and individuals.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. ndrisc+th[view] [source] 2026-02-03 17:00:00
>>Retric+Mc
The Girardoni repeating air rifle predates the ratification of the constitution by ~11 years and was taken on the Lewis and Clark expedition ~13 years later. Really the whole discussion around 2A is usually nonsense because it ignores the context that the entire Bill of Rights had a completely different meaning prior to the 14th amendment leading to incorporation over the last century (and other expansions of federal power via commerce clause); that is, the Bill of Rights originally did not apply to the states.

Very obviously individuals were expected to be part of the militia, which was the military at the time (c.f. the Militia Acts 2 years after ratification requiring individual gun ownership and very clearly laying out that all able-bodied white male citizens aged 18-45 were part of the militia), but also states could regulate weapons if they wanted.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. Retric+vj[view] [source] 2026-02-03 17:09:20
>>ndrisc+th
> Girardoni repeating air rifle

Not a firearm.

I didn’t say we could ban compressed air powered guns, I specifically said percussion caps. The Girardoni was way less dangerous than a modern handgun.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯
8. AngryD+4Q1[view] [source] 2026-02-04 00:30:56
>>Retric+vj
The Girardoni is certainly and unusual example but is deadly. However more importantly it is far from the first repeating firearm. There is the Kalthoff and Cookson repeating rifles as the most prominent examples. And both Jefferson and Washington personally got offered to purchase repeating firearms per their own journals, im im sure they weren't the only founders to receive such offers for both personal and military usage.
[go to top]