GitHub Actions Have "Major Outage"

>>graton+(OP)
The real lock-in is stars, not reliability [1].

They can have weekly outages, and the FOSS products would still be forced to be on GitHub.

1 - https://ashishb.net/tech/github-stars/

>>ashish+6e
I have literally never looked at github stars as a measure of quality or had it affect my decision. I have looked at git logs, websites, issues, etc. But I would be genuinely worried if someone used github stars as an indication. So many honestly stupid projects have a lot of stars, and stellar ones have next to none.

https://github.com/EvanLi/Github-Ranking/blob/master/Top100/...

proof here. The top are taken by chinese educational repos. Elastic Search and Spring Boot are the only projects actually used by anyone in the top 10. But why would I trust the stars for spring boot over the fact its used in every java shop on the planet?

>>ecshaf+7k
The hacker News crowd has always these elitist takes

  - I don't look at GitHub Stars
  - I don't use Facebook
  - I am never persuaded by advertisement
  - I can build Dropbox over a weekend

Even if these are true, it is irrelevant. Hacker News is only a sliver of the tech world.

>>ashish+i81
If I am sitting in a review session and the Engineer presenting brings up their options and why they are choosing to bring in technology A over B, and I ask them what their reasoning is. Being unsatisfied by "There are a lot of Github stars" Seems like an absolutely reasonable position to me. This is the equivalent of saying that something seems more true because it has a lot of facebook likes.

>>ecshaf+GE2
GitHub Stars are not a selection mechanism. They are filtering mechanism for most people.

Imagine someone is choosing between three FOSS projects - one has 90K stars, one has 30K and the thirdone has 1K.

In your meeting, the engineer will show you how he decided between the first and the second without even mentioning the third.

zlacker