zlacker

[return to "Deno Sandbox"]
1. johnsp+1[view] [source] 2026-02-03 17:33:20
>>johnsp+(OP)
"Over the past year, we’ve seen a shift in what Deno Deploy customers are building: platforms where users generate code with LLMs, and that code runs immediately without review. That code frequently calls LLMs itself, which means it needs API keys and network access.

This isn’t the traditional “run untrusted plugins” problem. It’s deeper: LLM-generated code, calling external APIs with real credentials, without human review. Sandboxing the compute isn’t enough. You need to control network egress and protect secrets from exfiltration.

Deno Sandbox provides both. And when the code is ready, you can deploy it directly to Deno Deploy without rebuilding."

◧◩
2. twosda+X6[view] [source] 2026-02-03 17:58:37
>>johnsp+1
Like the emdash, whenever I read: "this isn't x it's y" my dumb monkey brain goes "THATS AI" regardless if it's true or not.
◧◩◪
3. lucaca+f9[view] [source] 2026-02-03 18:07:12
>>twosda+X6
I can confirm Ryan is a real human :)
◧◩◪◨
4. zamada+pe[view] [source] 2026-02-03 18:26:35
>>lucaca+f9
Is there a chance you could ask Ryan if he had an LLM write/rewrite large parts of this blog post? I don't mind at all if he did or didn't in itself, it's a good and informative post, but I strongly assumed the same while reading the article and if it's truly not LLM writing then it would serve as a super useful indicator about how often I'm wrongly making that assumption.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. javier+Ct[view] [source] 2026-02-03 19:24:43
>>zamada+pe
As someone that has a habit of maybe overusing em dashes to my detriment, often times, and just something that I try to be mindful of in general. This whole thing of assuming that it's AI generated now is a huge blow. It feels like a personal attack.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. zamada+MU[view] [source] 2026-02-03 21:33:48
>>javier+Ct
"—" has always seemed like an particularly weak/unreliable signal to me, if it makes you feel any better. Triply so in any content one would expect smart quotes or formatted lists, but even in general.

RIP anyone who had a penchant for "not just x, but y" though. It's not even a go-to wording for me and I feel the need to rewrite it any time I type it out of fear it'll sound like LLMs.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. zbentl+ge1[view] [source] 2026-02-03 23:19:37
>>zamada+MU
> RIP anyone who had a penchant for "not just x, but y" though

I felt that. They didn’t just kidnap my boy; they massacred him.

[go to top]