zlacker

[return to "AI didn't break copyright law, it just exposed how broken it was"]
1. fallou+op[view] [source] 2026-02-03 17:35:26
>>at1as+(OP)
Basically a rage bait. If the law was bad, does it make it okay to violate it? In fact Anthropic is literally paying $1.5B on the copyright settlement, that indicates its completely a settled issue that AI companies have been violating this law. Some have been caught and fined, others are been lucky or that influence over the government.

> Copyright Law Was Built for Human Scale

No where in the law it has this kinda scoped limits. It has a time limit and scale doesnt not matter. Scale matter in a way that its gets harder to enforces buts that not the fault of copyright law. If you steal at a big scale, its still stealing.

◧◩
2. repels+tr[view] [source] 2026-02-03 17:42:21
>>fallou+op
I think build for, here means was intended to work at or with human scale in mind. Not be limited to.

Laws usually don't describe the bigger societal context in which they were conceived.

[go to top]