zlacker

>>moored+(OP)
It's hilarious that after all those years of resistance to technical writing and formal specification engineers and programmers have suddenly been reduced to nothing more than technical writers and specification designers. Funny that I somehow don't foresee technical writing pay bumps happening as a consequence of this sudden surge in importance.

>>voidho+z5
This post does a very good job of laying out that argument

https://jsulmont.github.io/swarms-ai/

>>verdve+N9
Reads like slop to me. Reeeeeally verbose and many “it’s not just …, it’s …” all over the place.

>>jondwi+ef
slopman, the new strawman argument

>>verdve+Gl
You just don't know which parts of the doc are real and which are hallucinated. Maybe the prompter checked everything and the content is actually good, but sadly many don't and there is a lot of slop flying around.

So if you want others to read the output you'll have to de-slopify it, ideally make it shorter and remove the tells.

If I go by good faith these days and trust that someone didn't just upload llm hallucinated bullshit, I'd sadly just be reading slop all day and not learning anything or worse even get deceived by hallucinations and make wrong assumptions. It's just a waste of someones precious life time.

LLMs can read through slop all day, humans can not without getting extremely annoyed.