zlacker

>>vikave+(OP)
> The prosecutor's office also said it was leaving X and would communicate on LinkedIn and Instagram from now on.

I mean, perhaps it's time to completely drop these US-owned, closed-source, algo-driven controversial platforms, and start treating the communication with the public that funds your existence in different terms. The goal should be to reach as many people, of course, but also to ensure that the method and medium of communication is in the interest of the public at large.

>>robthe+32
I agree with you. In my opinion it was already bad enough that official institutions were using Twitter as a communication platform before it belonged to Musk and started to restrict visibility to non-logged in users, but at least Twitter was arguably a mostly open communication platform and could be misunderstood as a public service in the minds of the less well-informed. However, deciding to "communicate" at this day and age on LinkedIn and Instagram, neither of which ever made a passing attempt to pretend to be a public communications service, boggles the mind.

>>Mordis+Yp
> official institutions were using Twitter as a communication platform before it belonged to Musk and started to restrict visibility to non-logged in users

... thereby driving up adoption far better than Twitter itself could. Ironic or what.