zlacker

>>bhoust+(OP)
It's notable that they blame "our upstream provider" when it's quite literally the same company. I can't imagine GitHub engineers are very happy about the forced migration to Azure.

>>guywit+Lo
> notable that they blame "our upstream provider" when it's quite literally the same company

As in why don't they mention Azure by name?

Or as in there shouldn't be isolated silos?

>>tbrown+ie1
I get your point, but it just sounds a bit funny when it's an artefact of corporate structure that it's true.

Like imagine if AWS was composed of separate companies for different services - Fargate was an Heroku acquisition say - and then they all went down and blamed their 'upstream provider' because they can't work without say VPC or EC2 availability.

I think that's all GP meant, it just reads a bit funny, not that it's wrong.