zlacker

[return to "xAI joins SpaceX"]
1. Button+C4[view] [source] 2026-02-02 22:07:23
>>g-mork+(OP)
SpaceX is too big to fail. It's important for national security.

I wonder if Elon wants to tangle all his businesses into SpaceX so they are all kept afloat by SpaceX's importance.

◧◩
2. Silver+xa[view] [source] 2026-02-02 22:28:50
>>Button+C4
Let’s be honest - this is just a way to prop up Twitter/X. It makes SpaceX shareholders subsidize X, and also American taxpayers who are giving contracts to SpaceX for highly sensitive things. The government should ideally refuse to give SpaceX work unless it unwinds this.
◧◩◪
3. adastr+hf[view] [source] 2026-02-02 22:45:29
>>Silver+xa
Why? The government is paying less for SpaceX than alternatives. It th cheapest and best service.
◧◩◪◨
4. Silver+Xg[view] [source] 2026-02-02 22:51:30
>>adastr+hf
Because Twitter/X is distorting our politics (with ann unbalanced scheme of censorship / amplification / suppression) and destroying the country by mainstreaming far right supremacist politics. Twitter/X does not deserve a single dollar of taxpayer money. If SpaceX is now part of that machine, it doesn’t deserve a single dollar either. I would rather pay more for alternatives and encourage their growth. I also look at any money given to this company as the equivalent of GOP campaign funding, so I feel it should be treated as illegal under the law.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. termin+3q[view] [source] 2026-02-02 23:29:25
>>Silver+Xg
The government is prevented from doing that by a little thing called the first amendment. "Mainstreaming far right supremacist politics" is just a hyperbolic way of saying he has politics you don't like and is exercising his freedom of the press by promoting it on the media platform he owns. Legally that is no different then the rights that every newspaper and TV station in the country has.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. Smirki+eN[view] [source] 2026-02-03 01:46:04
>>termin+3q
Actually the Trump administration is trying to strip legal status from people and deport them by way of an obscure law that gives the Secretary of State the discretion to do so if they deem those people a threat to the foreign policy goals of the US.

If these laws are still on the books when the next D administration takes over, they should use them against Elon, Thiel, etc - strip them of US citizenship, deport them, and nationalize their companies (followed with repealing those laws)

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. ben_w+bJ1[view] [source] 2026-02-03 09:44:35
>>Smirki+eN
> If these laws are still on the books when the next D administration takes over, they should use them against Elon, Thiel, etc - strip them of US citizenship, deport them, and nationalize their companies (followed with repealing those laws)

Or the current R admin, next time Musk has a spat with Trump.

Would definitely be a popcorn moment; doubly so if Canada has changed its rules on citizenship by then and has also stripped Musk of that, leaving him only with South African.

[go to top]