zlacker

>>trms+(OP)
In a nice and controlled manner, so seemingly no reason to panic just yet:

> I ended up suggesting to them that we look into gradually transitioning business operations and open source stewardship over, with provisions in place to ensure that Anki remains open source and true to the principles I’ve run it by all these years.

> This is a step back for me rather than a goodbye - I will still be involved with the project, albeit at a more sustainable level.

From AnkiHub:

> No enshittification. We’ve seen what happens when VC-backed companies acquire beloved tools. That’s not what this is. There are no investors involved, and we’re not here to extract value from something the community built together. Building in the right safeguards and processes to handle pressure without stifling necessary improvements is something we’re actively considering.

Relieved at that part where they say there are no investors involved, makes the whole thing a whole lot less risky. Good for everyone involved, and here's to many more years with Anki :)

>>embedd+Cd
Well every company claims no enshittification when they get acquired, in the end that's rarely the case. It's like Private Equity buying a company out and say "Nothing will change"

>>herman+uv
The key difference is the outside investors, who more times than not has no interest in what's best for users ultimately.

>>embedd+2y
Outside investors want profits. A company with thirty-five employees wants profits. I don't see a meaningful difference.

>>KPGv2+Hu1
Give it a try to work in both, see what work gets prioritized VS not in each of them. Makes a huge difference, in my experience. Investors are counting on eventually getting paid 10x or nothing, employees generally expect a monthly salary and a Christmas bonus, this massively change what direction they think the company should be on.